Close
Title here
Text here
Products
News
Blogs
About Us
Contact Us
Help
My Account
Update Nonprofit Report
Analyze Nonprofit Data
Take Action
Review A Charity
Welcome
Guest
!
Login
|
Register
Search GuideStar
Advanced Search
Refine Your Search
Nonprofit Search
2001 and Older
Home
>
News
>
Articles
>
2001 and Older
>
Organizations That Do Not Use Direct Mail
Share
|
Organizations That Do Not Use Direct Mail
November 2001
Nine survey participants reported that their organizations do not raise funds through the mail. They gave the following reasons (participants were able to list more than one reason):
We do not have the funds to do mass mailings (7 respondents).
We do not have the staff to do mass mailings (6 respondents).
Although we accept contributions, we do not solicit them (4 respondents).
We use our Web site to communicate with donors (3 respondents).
Fundraising by direct mail has not proven effective for our organization (2 respondents).
We are a membership association; people support us by joining as members rather than by making contributions (1 respondent).
We do not wish to annoy current donors or potential donors (1 respondent).
We do not accept contributions (1 respondent).
The organizations these participants represented fell into 5 income categories:
Less than $25,000 (3 respondents)
$25,000-$99,999 (3 respondents)
$250,000-$499,999 (1 respondent)
$500,000-$999,999 (1 respondent)
$1,000,000-$4,999,999 (1 respondent)
The represented organizations worked in 17 of the 26 major NTEE (National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities) subject areas (participants were able to list more than one subject area):
Animal Related (2 respondents)
Arts, Culture, Humanities (1 respondent)
Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy (2 respondents)
Community Improvement, Capacity Building (3 respondents)
Diseases, Disorders, Medical Disciplines (2 respondents)
Education (3 respondents)
Employment, Job Related (1 respondent)
Food, Agriculture, and Nutrition (1 respondent)
Health—General and Rehabilitative (5 respondents)
Housing, Shelter (7 respondents)
Medical Research (2 respondents)
Mental Health, Crisis Intervention (3 respondents)
Philanthropy, Voluntarism, Grantmaking (1 respondent)
Public, Societal Benefit (4 respondents)
Religion (1 respondent)
Science and Technology Research Institutes, Services (1 respondent)
Youth Development (3 respondents)
Suzanne E. Coffman, November 2001
© 2001, Philanthropic Research, Inc.