Close
Title here
December 2009
Adapted from the white paper by M+R Strategic Services
Sharing lists for fundraising outreach has long been accepted as a cost-effective practice in the direct mail world. But list sharing has yet to be applied to online lists in any great numbers. Many nonprofits are held back by fears over negative impacts to their e-mail lists or the quality of the new supporters. Others are simply uncertain about how online cross promotions (or "list swaps" or "list chaperones," as they're sometimes called) work. That's why we put it to the test.
First off, we do want to state for the record, a cross promotion does not involve actually swapping lists, and there is absolutely no spamming involved!
We helped two organizations with similar missions, the League of Conservation Voters and The Wilderness Society, coordinate a cross promotion in July 2007 and then two years later, took a look at the results.
An online cross promotion doesn't work like a direct mail list swap, where two groups literally swap lists. Instead of actually trading lists, each nonprofit sends an e-mail to its OWN list, promoting a link to the other nonprofit's Web site. Each nonprofit acquires only the names of people who affirmatively opt in on its Web site.
A lot of groups might worry about doing a cross promotion, because if your supporters start getting more e-mail from another nonprofit, obviously they are going to be less likely to take action for your nonprofit. Happily, our study found that the reverse was true!
Two years after the original cross promotion, the LCV and TWS supporters who participated in the cross promotion are actually more likely to take action for the original nonprofit than they were before the cross promotion took place. We were happily surprised by this discovery—not only did the cross promotion have no clear negative effects, it actually increased activism among participants!
What does this mean for advocacy? In this case, the cross promotion was a win-win. Not only did the original supporters take more actions, but each group now had a whole new group of people to support their advocacy efforts because of the list growth from the cross promotion.
What about for fundraising? For this cross promotion, we found no statistical evidence that the cross promotion had any negative impact on the giving behavior of supporters that participated.
While we didn't see the same sort of increase in response rates that we saw for advocacy, the fact that cross promotion participants continued to donate at the same rates as they had in the past was good news. As long as you aren't turning off existing donors, the cross promotion only improves your fundraising efforts because it increases the number of people from whom you could raise money.
Before you decide to cancel all viral campaigns and only pursue a cross promotion strategy for list growth, here are three things to consider:
Draft a written agreement. A short contract is a critical part to making sure the details of the cross promotion are clear and each group is comfortable with the timeline of the cross promotion. The agreement should:
We coordinated a cross promotion with the two environmental organizations in July of 2007. Two years later, we analyzed the advocacy and fundraising response rates as well as the unsubscribe rate for both organizations. We compared the test group (the subscribers from each organization who were offered and accepted the cross promotion) to the control group of subscribers who were not offered the cross promotion and those who were offered the cross promotion but did not accept.
The following subgroups were suppressed from the initial cross promotion and thus not included in either the test or control group:
After the cross promotion, those who accepted the cross promotion were treated identically to the rest of the list. They did not receive a special welcome message or other fundraising ask sequence.
Read the white paper >
Katherine Mackenzie and Jessica Bosanko, M+R Strategic Services© 2009, M+R Strategic Services. Adapted with permission of M+R Strategic Services.
Katherine Mackenzie is a consultant and Jessica Bosanko is a senior consultant with M+R Strategic Services. M+R is dedicated to helping clients advance their missions in order to bring about positive change. M+R helps organizations and campaigns they believe in develop smart and effective strategies, hone their messages, mobilize their members, build grassroots support, raise money, and communicate effectively with the media, the public, and decision makers, both online and offline.