Unite 2 Fight Paralysis
Voice of the Cure
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/d) paralyzed thousands of people per year. At the moment there are minimal effective treatments for restoring function and overall health to someone who suffers this devastating injury. SCI/D takes young people out of the work force, puts an enormous financial and emotional strain on families, and brings numerous secondary complications that compromise both quality and length of life. We believe that persons living with SCI/D must take a more active role in advocating for treatments that will improve their lives. To that end we are empowering the community with knowledge, organization, advocacy initiatives, and support.
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Annual Science & Advocacy Symposium
The Annual Science & Advocacy Symposium brings together the key players in advancing curative therapies: research scientists, clinicians, patients, and family members. The symposium changes location each year, and has now visited 11 different cities. A virtual attendance option was added in 2019. The symposium will be held in Salt Lake City in 2021.
Scientific Advisory Board
Leading neuroscientists work with community fundraising organizations to review and recommend research and clinical projects worthy of support.
Cure Advocacy Network
The Cure Advocacy Network (CAN) encompasses a wide range of projects including the SCI CureCast podcast, advancement of state initiatives to fund SCI research, The Cure Map film project, and Team U2FP.
CureCast Podcast
U2FP's Executive Director, Matthew Rodreick and SCI Advocate Jason Stoffer co-host the CureCast Podcast interviewing scientists, clinicians, SCI community activists and advocates and members of industry to talk about the various efforts toward curing paralysis
Where we work
Videos
Our results
How does this organization measure their results? It's a hard question but an important one.
Evaluation documents
Download evaluation reportsNumber of policymakers or candidates reached
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Cure Advocacy Network
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
While we were lobbying for new legislation in Wisconsin and Colorado, we continued to deepen the impact our (CAN) advocates are having in states where weve already passed SCI Research grant bills.
Number of government officials who publicly support the advocacy effort
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Cure Advocacy Network
Type of Metric
Output - describing our activities and reach
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
Legislators in WI who signed on to the research funding bill or verbally committed during our hearing. 20 Legislators in MN and PA who supported our efforts in those states.need to look up the Bills
Number of SCI adults working with researchers to provode lived in experiences with SCI
This metric is no longer tracked.Totals By Year
Related Program
Cure Advocacy Network
Type of Metric
Input - describing resources we use
Direction of Success
Increasing
Context Notes
In 2021, U2FP began placing individuals with a spinal cord injury into SCI research labs to act as expert consultants. We dubbed this initiative, Lab Rats.
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
Goals & Strategy
Reports and documents
Download strategic planLearn about the organization's key goals, strategies, capabilities, and progress.
Charting impact
Four powerful questions that require reflection about what really matters - results.
What is the organization aiming to accomplish?
We want to see meaningful recovery for people living with the devastating effects of paralysis after spinal cord injury. The majority are injured during their most productive years (20-35), and the cost to families and society is enormous. Our goals are to educate our advocates, foster collaborations and partnerships, and bring voice & visibility to this pressing need.
What are the organization's key strategies for making this happen?
Convene key stakeholders in the international spinal cord injury community for an exchange of knowledge and strategies for accelerating progress. Develop a knowledgable and vocal advocate population to bring greater visibility to the realities of spinal cord injury. Foster partnerships among scientists and between funders and research projects.
What are the organization's capabilities for doing this?
Since our founding in 2005 we have forged partnerships throughout the research, rehabilitation, and advocacy communities. We have helped to advance several lines of promising research. Our leadership team is comprised of persons with a direct connection to spinal cord injury as either survivors or family members; our commitment is unwavering and our integrity is strong - characteristics that are well respected and appreciated in the broader paralysis community.
What have they accomplished so far and what's next?
We have brought attention to the need for research to address the problems associated with chronic SCI/D, and in particular the numerous secondary complications that consumers want to see fixed. The research community is now prioritizing those needs. We have also galvanized community advocates to pass state legislation that will increase dollars for research funding, as well as guarantee that persons with SCI/D sit on review boards and have a voice in decision-making. We will continue to amplify this voice and broaden our connections with the research, funding, and clinical stakeholders.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Unite 2 Fight Paralysis
Board of directorsas of 04/29/2024
Michael Burris
Retired
Term: 2021 - 2025
Barry Munro
Canadian Spinal Research Organization
Mike Burris
Retired
Alexander Rabchevsky
University of Kentucky, College of Medicine
Christel Mitrovich
Reneu Health Inc.
Traci Fernandez
TRYAbility Rehab
Johnnie Edwards
Retired
Quinn Brett
CO DNR
Jim Hamer
DP Clinical
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
No data
Gender identity
Transgender Identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.
Equity strategies
Last updated: 05/06/2021GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.