All Hands Raised
Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
All Hands Raised Partnership
As a collective impact backbone organization, All Hands Raised (AHR) keeps racial educational equity front and center in all our work. Eliminating barriers faced by kids in their path from birth-to-career gives them access to, and a foundation for success beyond high school. Because AHR provides data-driven coaching and support to school teams composed of teachers, counselors, principals, and culturally-specific organizations to identify practices that work, these educator teams also benefit from AHR’s work. These practices are communicated to districts and leadership bodies to inspire scale and systemic transformation that benefits students. AHR serves as the backbone organization for the All Hands Raised Partnership by gathering Multnomah County’s diverse efforts and aligning them in ways that strengthen supports for kids. We work towards improving the way adults collaborate to improve academic outcomes for kids.
Where we work
External reviews

How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
All Hands Raised (AHR) convenes community stakeholders at multiple levels--from the executive level to educators and community members who work directly with students and families and from all sectors. We collectively have a single goal: to improve the educational outcomes and long-term career prospects for the more than 220,000 young people who live in Multnomah County using a racial educational equity lens. AHR is the primary convener of community partners who identify the systemic factors contributing to barriers for student success and identify solutions to mitigate systemic racism. We relentlessly and systematically connect our community’s diverse assets with the explicit goal of working in new ways together to improve kids’ success inside and outside of school.
-
How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve?
Focus groups or interviews (by phone or in person), Community meetings/Town halls,
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve,
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
Over ten years ago, All Hands Raised convened the community with a goal of having a shared set of disaggregated data to measure student success. The result was a set of twelve Community-wide indicators that are reviewed on an annual basis. All Hands Raised began the process a year ago to gather feedback from all of our community partners to determine whether these indicators were the right indicators and, if not, suggestions on what indicators would be more relevant to measure. The end result was that the community feedback recommended a refresh of the Community-wide Indicators to reflect a sharper focus on racial equity and identify upstream indicators that better inform needed changes.
-
With whom is the organization sharing feedback?
The people we serve, Our staff, Our board, Our funders, Our community partners,
-
How has asking for feedback from the people you serve changed your relationship?
The feedback AHR regularly receives from the people we serve strengthens the relationship and the sense of shared accountability in working to ensure student success. As a collective impact organization, we provide the forum and environment that empowers the community to have shared ownership and accountability for working on system transformation that can increase the level of student success; particularly for BIPOC students.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback,
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback,
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
All Hands Raised
Board of directorsas of 02/16/2022
Cole Mills
Bridgetown Wealth Management
Term: 2021 -
Karis Stoudamire-Phillips
Moda Health
Term: 2021 -
Jonathan Blasher
Metro
Tamara Brown
Heritage Bank
Emi Donis
Senior Aerospace
Teyent Gossa
Portland General Electric
Whitney Grubbs
For a Better Oregon
Dewayne Hankins
Portland Trail Blazers
Travis Merrill
Resideo Technologies
Charu Nair
Keys2DEI Consulting
Andrew Ognall
Umpqua Holdings Corporation
Andrew Over
Regence BlueShield
Carolyn Sizemore
Mortensen
Jahed Sukhun
Muslim Educational Trust
Felicia Tripp Folsom
The Contingent
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? Yes -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
Disability
No data
We do not display disability information for organizations with fewer than 15 staff.
Equity strategies
Last updated: 01/12/2022GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.