Programs and results
What we aim to solve
Our programs
What are the organization's current programs, how do they measure success, and who do the programs serve?
Community-based Youth Mentoring
Youth eligible for community-based mentoring meet 2 of 3 criteria: 1) live in non-traditional households (single parent, grandparent-led, foster parent, etc) 2) are eligible for school free-or-reduced lunch program or 3) have a parent or loved one with a history of incarceration. A family interview is conducted to assess interests, needs and possible other family referrals.
Mentors are recruited from community groups, employers, churches, media and community fairs. They undergo a rigorous background check to ensure the youth's safety. Mentors are matched with youth based on interests and compatibility in order to develop long and strong matches. Matches meet 2-4 times per month; each outing lasting approximately 2-4 hours.
Mentors, parents and youth are called by staff monthly the first year and then quarterly to see how the match is progressing. Points addressed during the contact calls include: overall check-in, inquiring if there are any safety concerns and offering guidance on any questions or issues that arise. A licensed clinician is available to staff for consultation.
School/Site Based Mentoring
The High School Bigs Program is a collaboration of an elementary school with a local high school and facilitated by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California staff. Our elementary school clients (Littles) are referred to the program either by self referral, school counselor, social worker or school personnel. Littles are assessed and matched with a mentor based on compatibility.
Our high school mentors (Bigs) also take part in a rigorous vetting process to ensure commitment to the program and their Little.
Once enrolled in the program, Bigs and Littles are matched based on compatibility and meet once a week for 90 minutes throughout the school year and monthly during the summer.
All High School Bigs program match meetings are supervised by professionally trained staff with a bachelor's degree in social work or a related field.
Where we work
Awards
Family Strengthening Award 2007
Annie E. Casey Foundation/Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Family Strengthening Award 2008
Annie E. Casey Foundation/Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Quality Award 2005
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Gold Standard 2016
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Quality Award 2015
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Pinnacle 2017
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
External reviews

Videos
Our Sustainable Development Goals
Learn more about Sustainable Development Goals.
How we listen
Seeking feedback from people served makes programs more responsive and effective. Here’s how this organization is listening.
-
Who are the people you serve with your mission?
At-risk youth who need a mentor/ role model in their life.
-
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve, To understand people's needs and how we can help them achieve their goals
-
What significant change resulted from feedback?
We have listed to feedback from our constituents, especially during the pandemic, and modified our outings policies to make way for matches that were comfortable meeting while still following CDC guidelines.
-
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually, We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people, We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible, We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us, We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.), We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.), We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response, We act on the feedback we receive, We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback, We ask the people who gave us feedback how well they think we responded
-
What challenges does the organization face when collecting feedback?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Financials
Unlock nonprofit financial insights that will help you make more informed decisions. Try our monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights?
Learn more
about GuideStar Pro.
Operations
The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Connect with nonprofit leaders
SubscribeBuild relationships with key people who manage and lead nonprofit organizations with GuideStar Pro. Try a low commitment monthly plan today.
- Analyze a variety of pre-calculated financial metrics
- Access beautifully interactive analysis and comparison tools
- Compare nonprofit financials to similar organizations
Want to see how you can enhance your nonprofit research and unlock more insights? Learn More about GuideStar Pro.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California
Board of directorsas of 03/15/2023
Mr. William Hicks
County of Fresno
Term: 2016 - 2023
Jim Horn
Tamiyasu, Smith, Horn, and Braun
Chris Wiehl
Utility Cost Management
Richard Lord
SolutionsHRGroup
Greg Mason
McCormick Barstow
Sarah Wright
Adventist Health System
Scott Weber
RBC Wealth Management
Jayme Stevens
Stevens Wireless Communications
Craig Fourchy
Ultragro
Angela Venetis-Colon
Avenal State Prison
Moses Stites
Public Utilities Commission
Charles Taylor
Lang Richert Patch
Board leadership practices
GuideStar worked with BoardSource, the national leader in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section.
-
Board orientation and education
Does the board conduct a formal orientation for new board members and require all board members to sign a written agreement regarding their roles, responsibilities, and expectations? Yes -
CEO oversight
Has the board conducted a formal, written assessment of the chief executive within the past year ? No -
Ethics and transparency
Have the board and senior staff reviewed the conflict-of-interest policy and completed and signed disclosure statements in the past year? Yes -
Board composition
Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Yes -
Board performance
Has the board conducted a formal, written self-assessment of its performance within the past three years? Yes
Organizational demographics
Who works and leads organizations that serve our diverse communities? Candid partnered with CHANGE Philanthropy on this demographic section.
Leadership
The organization's leader identifies as:
The organization's co-leader identifies as:
Race & ethnicity
Gender identity
Sexual orientation
No data
Disability
No data
Equity strategies
Last updated: 06/15/2021GuideStar partnered with Equity in the Center - an organization that works to shift mindsets, practices, and systems to increase racial equity - to create this section. Learn more
- We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
- We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and / or portfolios.
- We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization's programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
- We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
- We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
- We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured.
- We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.
- We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
- We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
- We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
- We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
- We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
- We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
- We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.